Proton pump inhibitors in systemic sclerosis: a reappraisal to optimise treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease

Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is associated with substantial morbidity in patients with systemic sclerosis. Although the introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical care represents a major achievement in the management of gastro-oesophageal problems in systemic sclerosis, PPIs are seldom fully effective in patients with systemic sclerosis, and the use of maximum PPI doses is a very frequent clinical practice. However, there is little evidence to support the empirical use of PPIs in systemic sclerosis. This scarcity of evidence is especially relevant with regards to the safety concerns of long-term exposure, which have been raised in the general population. The purpose of this Viewpoint is to highlight the substantial beneficial impact of PPIs on GERD in patients with systemic sclerosis, while considering the potential adverse effects in this patient population. Furthermore, we highlight the unmet needs of people with systemic sclerosis and GERD and propose an agenda for future research to optimise the safe and effective use of PPIs in systemic sclerosis. Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd

NAILFOLD CAPILLAROSCOPY: A SURVEY OF CURRENT UK PRACTICE AND 'NEXT STEPS' TO FACILITATE GENERALISED UPTAKE

Background/Aims Nailfold capillaroscopy has a key role in the assessment of patients with Raynaud's phenomenon (RP) providing a window of opportunity for the early diagnosis of systemic sclerosis (SSc). Anecdotal evidence indicates that this opportunity is not being fully realised across UK rheumatology centres. Reasons for apparent discrepancies in use of capillaroscopy may relate to a lack of expertise, confidence or equipment. Exploratory work has demonstrated the potential for an internet-based standardised system for clinical reporting of nailfold capillaroscopy images to mitigate current inequities in care provision. The overall aim of this study was to understand current practices in the diagnosis of SSc in UK rheumatology centres with specific reference to identifying barriers to the use of nailfold capillaroscopy. A secondary aim was to understand rheumatologists' views on a standardised system to facilitate the timely diagnosis of SSc. Methods An online survey comprising closed and free-text questions was developed using expert (n=7) opinion from clinicians, scientists and health service researchers. The survey was piloted (n=5) and sent to UK-based rheumatologists using established electronic mailing lists between 2nd October 2020 and 8th March 2021. Respondents were asked to describe workloads and practices typically seen before the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Results Survey responses were received from 104 rheumatologists representing centres across the UK. Wide variation in terms of workloads and practices were described (See Table 1). Only 41% (n=43) of respondents reported using nailfold capillaroscopy provided at their centres. Key barriers were access to equipment and a lack of expertise in terms of acquiring and analysing images. Respondents indicated that a centralised internet-based system for storing images and sharing diagnoses would provide access to expertise and the possibility of timely diagnoses Conclusion Substantial variation in approaches to the diagnosis of SSc across the UK was identified. Potential benefits of a standardised system were described by respondents including the improved diagnosis and management of SSc, realising potential patient benefits and reducing current health inequalities. Survey findings provide evidence to help develop future studies to develop and evaluate the proposed new system.